|
1
|
- Technology & Public Participation:
- When, What, Why, and How (…Much)
|
|
2
|
- Bill Wiseman
- Manager of Planning Services
- RBF Consulting
- Steve Bein
- Vice President, GIS Services
- RBF Consulting
- Kevin Viera
- Program Manager
- Western Riverside County COG
|
|
3
|
- Bill Wiseman
- Practices and Applications
- Steve Bein
- Case Study – Riverside County Integrated Plan
- Kevin Viera
- Case Study - Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan and Transportation Mitigation
- Questions and Answers
|
|
4
|
- Improve the quality of the public participation process
- Ensure that place-based information matters
- Connect local and regional initiatives and plans
- Educate and inform the public
- Engage in collective visioning and plan development
- Enhance community decision-making
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Don’t have enough time to do the research
- Don’t feel equipped to make decisions
- Don’t feel that participation does any good
- Don’t fully understand – too complex
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Provides the most cost effective way to reach the most people
- Require information to be provided in a web-useable format
- Make the information easy to find
- Keep information current
- Use the Web to compliment/enhance an overall public involvement plan
|
|
12
|
- Be visual
- Create a means for feedback
- Response forms
- Polling
- E-mail
- Utilize site tracking to report usage and refine site features
- Clarify engagement rules internally and commit to fulfilling them to
maintain consistent public expectations
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Appropriate for very focused groups with a clearly defined agenda
- Clearly communicate purpose/objectives/outcomes
- Incorporate interactive features to encourage user input > polls,
chat questions
- Encourage users to sign-on early
to avoid delays
- Costs = ~25-35 cents/minute/participant
|
|
15
|
- Well suited for urban design issues
- Downtown revitalization
- Design guidelines
- Zoning code revisions
- Easy to implement and understand
- Can be readily customized based on local conditions
- Segment the presentation into topics
- Allow for discussion following the survey
- Cost range $1,500+
|
|
16
|
- Fosters ideas that can be realized immediately in a compelling, easily
understandable format
- Empowers visionary thinking
- Requires considerable skill to prepare
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Allows for Web publishing of maps and data
- User’s can select map layers and query information
- Integrate data from multiple sources (Internet or local) and serve it on
the Web
|
|
23
|
- “High-powered” decision support systems integrating multiple data
sources
- Environment & Land Use (GIS)
- Housing & Employment (Demographics)
- Transportation (Models)
- Infrastructure (GIS & CIP)
- Dynamic analysis of fiscal, and social land use decisions >policy
implications
- Places heavy demands on having available and correct data
- Considerable expertise to integrate
- Engages the public to be part of the process
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Create Graphic and Tabular Data
- Use GIS Analysis Tools to add attributes
- Extract Tabular Database
- Use non-graphic “Geo-Link”
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- Network
- Personal displays
- Hi-resolution, big screens
- Displays in hall
|
|
54
|
- Designed to protect up to146 species (approximately 32 listed species)
- Includes 63 plants, 45 birds, 14 mammals, 12 reptiles, 5 amphibians, 3
crustaceans, 2 insects, 2 fish
- Study area encompasses 1.2 million acres in Western Riverside County
- Builds on existing public lands to create a reserve system of 500,000
acres
- Approximately 153,000 acres of Additional Reserve Lands
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
- Use GIS in evaluating development projects proposed by developers during
the review process
- Use of GIS layers to show developer areas for preservation and
potential developable land
- Coordination of proposed development projects between local
jurisdictions and MSHCP through a common database
- Use GIS to display information collected and stored in a consolidated
database to evaluate growth and land protected
- Ultimately the data will be used in to demonstrate to the public how the
project proceeding
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
- To provide a new revenue stream to augment the projected shortfall for
regional transportation facilities;
- To mitigate the traffic impacts from new development on the regional
system of highways and arterials;
- To ensure that new development pays its fair share to provide necessary
infrastructure improvements.
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
- GIS was used to show how impacts from one area can effect the
transportation facilities on another;
- Display why a consolidated transportation system is needed on a regional
level;
- Allow the public & developers an opportunity to evaluate the system.
|
|
62
|
- Identify your objectives and approach at the outset
- Apply technology according to your audience and your expectations of
them
- Temper expectations with available resources
- Design for longevity and reusability
- Collaborate to encourage broader participation
- Technology is not a panacea
|
|
63
|
- Technology & Public Participation
- Questions and Comments
|
|
64
|
|