Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
"Technology & Public Participation"
  • Technology & Public Participation:
  • When, What, Why, and How (…Much)


2
Introductions
  • Bill Wiseman
  • Manager of Planning Services
  • RBF Consulting


  • Steve Bein
  • Vice President, GIS Services
  • RBF Consulting


  • Kevin Viera
  • Program Manager
  • Western Riverside County COG


3
Agenda
  • Bill Wiseman
  • Practices and Applications


  • Steve Bein
  • Case Study – Riverside County Integrated Plan


  • Kevin Viera
  • Case Study - Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and Transportation Mitigation



  • Questions and Answers


4
Technology and Public Participation Objectives
  • Improve the quality of the public participation process
  • Ensure that place-based information matters
  • Connect local and regional initiatives and plans
  • Educate and inform the public
  • Engage in collective visioning and plan development
  • Enhance community decision-making


5
Types of Public Participants
6
The Ladder of Control
7
Barriers to Public Participation
  • Don’t have enough time to do the research
  • Don’t feel equipped to make decisions
  • Don’t feel that participation does any good
  • Don’t fully understand – too complex
8
Public Participation Technologies
9
Passive Public Participation
10
Active Public Participation
11
Web-based Public Participation
  • Provides the most cost effective way to reach the most people
  • Require information to be provided in a web-useable format
  • Make the information easy to find
  • Keep information current
  • Use the Web to compliment/enhance an overall public involvement plan



12
Web-based Public Participation
  • Be visual
  • Create a means for feedback
      • Response forms
      • Polling
      • E-mail
  • Utilize site tracking to report usage and refine site features
  • Clarify engagement rules internally and commit to fulfilling them to maintain consistent public expectations



13
Web Applications
14
Web Conferencing
  • Appropriate for very focused groups with a clearly defined agenda
  • Clearly communicate purpose/objectives/outcomes
  • Incorporate interactive features to encourage user input > polls, chat questions
  • Encourage users to sign-on early
    to avoid delays
  • Costs = ~25-35 cents/minute/participant
15
Visual Preference Surveys
  • Well suited for urban design issues
    • Downtown revitalization
    • Design guidelines
    • Zoning code revisions
  • Easy to implement and understand
  • Can be readily customized based on local conditions
  • Segment the presentation into topics
  • Allow for discussion following the survey
  • Cost range $1,500+
16
Visual Simulations
  • Fosters ideas that can be realized immediately in a compelling, easily understandable format
  • Empowers visionary thinking
  • Requires considerable skill to prepare


17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
Web-based GIS
  • Allows for Web publishing of maps and data
  • User’s can select map layers and query information
  • Integrate data from multiple sources (Internet or local) and serve it on the Web



23
Planning Support Systems (PSS)
  • “High-powered” decision support systems integrating multiple data sources
    • Environment & Land Use (GIS)
    • Housing & Employment (Demographics)
    • Transportation (Models)
    • Infrastructure (GIS & CIP)
  • Dynamic analysis of fiscal, and social land use decisions >policy implications
  • Places heavy demands on having available and correct data
  • Considerable expertise to integrate
  • Engages the public to be part of the process
24
Index Indicators
25
Index - Spatial Diagnostics
26
Index—Transportation Networks
27
Choosing a Planning Support System
28
Example Rating Criteria Table
29
Case Study - RCIP
30
Riverside County
31
An Integrated Approach
32
Public Access
33
Web Mapping – How it works
34
 
35
Two Versions
36
Simplified Interface
37
Advanced Mapping Tool
38
 
39
 
40
 
41
 
42
 
43
 
44
 
45
 
46
 
47
 
48
Post-Graphic GIS Database?!
  • Create Graphic and Tabular Data
  • Use GIS Analysis Tools to add attributes
  • Extract Tabular Database
  • Use non-graphic “Geo-Link”
49
Post-Graphic GIS Database
50
Combining Data from Many Sources
51
Post-Graphic GIS Database
52
Dynamic Public Participation
53
Facilities of the Future
  • Network
  • Personal displays
  • Hi-resolution,  big screens
  • Displays in hall
54
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
  • Designed to protect up to146 species (approximately 32 listed species)
  • Includes 63 plants, 45 birds, 14 mammals, 12 reptiles, 5 amphibians, 3 crustaceans, 2 insects, 2 fish
  • Study area encompasses 1.2 million acres in Western Riverside County
  • Builds on existing public lands to create a reserve system of 500,000 acres
  • Approximately 153,000 acres of Additional Reserve Lands
55
 
56
 
57
Using GIS in Development Process
  • Use GIS in evaluating development projects proposed by developers during the review process
    • Use of GIS layers to show developer areas for preservation and potential developable land
  • Coordination of proposed development projects between local jurisdictions and MSHCP through a common database
  • Use GIS to display information collected and stored in a consolidated database to evaluate growth and land protected
  • Ultimately the data will be used in to demonstrate to the public how the project proceeding


58
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
59
Purpose of the TUMF?
  • To provide a new revenue stream to augment the projected shortfall for regional transportation facilities;
  • To mitigate the traffic impacts from new development on the regional system of highways and arterials;
  • To ensure that new development pays its fair share to provide necessary infrastructure improvements.
60
 
61
TUMP & GIS
  • GIS was used to show how impacts from one area can effect the transportation facilities on another;
  • Display why a consolidated transportation system is needed on a regional level;
  • Allow the public & developers an opportunity to evaluate the system.




62
Technology and Public Participation
Concluding Thoughts
  • Identify your objectives and approach at the outset
  • Apply technology according to your audience and your expectations of them
  • Temper expectations with available resources
  • Design for longevity and reusability
  • Collaborate to encourage broader participation
  • Technology is not a panacea
63
"Technology & Public Participation"
  • Technology & Public Participation
  • Questions and Comments


64